NOTICE


WARNING ! – Ongoing attempts to by-pass and change the administrative functions and content of this blog ( generic "HACKS") has resulted in Substantial Reduction of normal access. Expectations of restricted availability and access will occur as these intrusions persist.

WATER !! WATER ? "Water"

Are you concerned/interested in Atkinson's water issue?
Visit the new water discussion forum.
http://www.just-goaway.com/
NEW PETITION ON FORUM
New Information and Updates Daily

Monday, March 12

No Free Ride in Atkinson- Part 2

Welcome to another new contributor under the Publius byline

Anonymous said...
Publius:

Article Submission:

No Free Ride Part II - Facts & The Van

Recently, I received a letter from the Chief asking taxpayers to vote to fund a new wheelchair van for Elderly Services. And I quote his letter:

"We are still receiving donations towards this van and all funds received during the year will be applied to the total cost of the van."

Since the Selectman approve all disbursements from the Police Dept. Donation Account, I did some checking in the 2006 Selectman meeting minutes. Following are strict facts taken from the 2006 minutes. You can confirm them all yourself by going to the Town of Atkinson website at:

http://www.town-atkinsonnh.com/

Select “Selectman” link
Select “Update Selectman Meetings Minutes”

Following is a list of withdrawls from the PD Donations fund. These were approved by the Selectman. The date of the minutes is mentioned so you can look it up yourself:

12/18/2006 $950
9/18/2006 $870
8/28/2006 $225
7/17/2006 $428
6/26/2006 $850
4/6/2006 $900
3/27/1902 $828
2/13/2006 $950
1/23/2006 $2,300

Grand Total for 2006: $8,301

The reason for each withdrawl is stipulated. They include such things a paying for:

- "Helping a senior in need of assistance" ($400)
- Help a Senior w/electric bill ($240)
- Miscellaneous (4 entries: two of them total $338, the other two have no cost specific associated with them - a guess is they are probably similar in the $300-$400 range based on total withdrawl)

Commentary/Opinion Section

Please don't get me wrong. I am not against helping seniors. The question is this - if the donation funds were managed properly, isn't there enough annual funding donated to cover the costs requested for the wheel chair van? We know that donations are coming in every year. And the chief is promising that "....all funds received during the year will be applied to the total cost of the wheelchair van." Again, his written words, not mine.

Since $8,301 was spent in 2006 out of the donation funds, and the chief promises to use all incoming funds to cover the total cost of the wheelchair van, why are taxpayers being asked to foot the bill for the new van? He could have easily covered the cost of the first year with some of the money spent in 2006.

It should also be noted the Salem Caregivers offers a redundant service which raises even more questions. Questions such as - why do we need to buy this if Salem Caregivers offers it? How many wheelchair rides do we give? Is the demand overwhelming Salem?

My other question to the Budget committee is this: Is there a documented paper trail showing where every penny is going from these donation accounts? How do we know the direct donations get to people?

For those who received direct financial assistance (but no obligation for a vote here!), were they denied state aid for energy assistance - and if so, doesn't that usually means they don't qualify? I would think the purpose of Elderly Affairs is to help people become aware of and apply for state services like energy assistance, food stamps or whatever benefits may be available to seniors in need. We pay the State of NH taxes for those programs, already. So wouldn't it make more sense to ensure they use state services and then apply donation funds toward the wheelchair van?

And how does our chief determine who gets aid and who does not? Why would your grandmother get direct financial assistance as opposed to mine?

And what are all these "Miscellaneous" withdrawls? The only thing that can answer this question is receipts, cancelled checks and audits. Do we have these things in place? Has any official outside of the PD seen them?

The more closely we look at the management of Elderly Affairs, the more questions that come up.

What really confused me was in the November 20, 2006 minutes where the Chief made the following request to Selectman and I quote:

"Chief Consentino is requesting of the Board for a new line item in the Police Department budget for elderly affairs. The reasons Chief Consentino is requesting that the elderly affairs operation be placed in the Police Department budget is because it schedules senior transports, the community service officers are police officers, the transport vehicles are police cars, the payroll records are paid through the Police Department payroll, the expenses are through the Police Department budget, the gasoline is paid through the Police Department and the Police Department is in charge of the senior program."

So now he wants everything under the PD budget. Why?

I can envision a retirement plan that goes like this:

1) Move Elderly Affairs under PD
2) Retire and get job as Community Officer (assuming Fred gets re-elected and article 23 passes)
3) Continue to maintain the status quo

With two of his family members already working for the Atkinson PD and the positioning of LT Baldwin as his successor, in my opinion, it seems like a logical retirement plan to me. But that is just one person's opinion.

Giving our elderly citizens rides, sending them cards and running concerts is not a police function. Our officers should be policing the streets and fighting crime and not being a taxi service.

I also have to take note of the recent expansion of the services offered by Elderly Affairs where you can get a ride to a visit a friend (this is new to me - just check the ads in the Tribune). What a nice gesture. But having POLICE DEPT resources giving rides to a friend? Has every elderly person in town been abandoned by every relative and neighbor they have?

Who said there is no free ride in Atkinson??

Moving the Dept of Elderly Services under the Recreation Dept is a logical scenario. It should also be staffed by volunteers (See Salem Caregivers Website). In our town, I bet many would step up and volunteer to give one senior one ride a week. It would be a great way to get to know our neighbors better. In a town of 6800, we only need a handful of volunteers (count me in as one). But I would only volunteer if there was new management. Then, AND ONLY THEN, will a ride for the Elderly in Atkinson be truly Free.

6 comments:

MAcciard said...

In Answer to your budgetary question of review of the Donation acct. the answer is that the budget committee is aware of the balance of that acct. but do not regularly review that account because it is an off-budget acct. We sometimes ask the chief to pay certain items out of it. but that is it.

The selectmen have the authority to spend that money, by the warrant article that established the account and the establishing RSA. Funy thing is they have never taken a vote to expend anything out of that acct., they simply have a public hearing, and close it. no vote. But then again they bought a $30,000 vehicle without taking a vote either.

Sorry for the vitriol, I hope my answer was helpful.

Mark R. Acciard

Anonymous said...

Bravo -- Nice article

I often wondered why the Elderly Affairs couldn't be spun off and made into a non-profit organization. The town could still fund it but all donations could be tax deductable. Any tax accountants in the audience?

Anonymous said...

I gotta tell ya. MY grandmother would never get assistance; neither would I or my children. I have a relatively long history with the Chief, and he doesn't like me very much. Moreover, I ALWAYS obey the speed limit in Atkinson because I don't want the ticket I know I'd get if I didn't.
I also get out of town via the shortest route to avoid the police all together! Great way to live.

Anonymous said...

The possibility of a non-profit organization under the supervision of the Recreation Commission was brought up to the Chief once. He didn't like it very much. Insisted that the only way it can operate is under the Police Department.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Acciard:

Thank you for your response. I guess I do not clearly understand how an "off-budget account" is managed by the town (ie. who has oversight responsibility?.

The questions that I think need to be answered include:

Is there a full paper trail on these "off-budget accounts" known as the Police Donations fund and the Elderly Donations Fund?

Has the budget committee or any non-PD town official confirmed the expenditures have in fact been used for the items requested?

Receipts? Cancelled checks? Audits? Who in town has authority to audit these accounts?

Taxpayers have a right to know because maybe it is not even necessary to ask taxpayers to fund things like a wheel chair van if the donations were managed effectively. How can I be asked to vote for this van if the taxpayers do not have a clear accounting of the donations budgets? The chief's letter promised to use all donations toward the van. So he needs more money....why?

Prioritizing by need is what should be occurring. Maybe the chief should stop sending town wide mailings ($870 for one mailing) and put those funds toward the van.

And the questions about Salem Caregivers are still out there.

This is all about proper financial management and NOT cutting elderly services. We live in a world of limited resources and we have to be smart about how we can use them best.

Anonymous said...

I dare the chief or anyone else to give me a logical cogent reason why it can not be run out of the Recreation dept. or the community center.


ATKINSON's Vietnam HONOR ROLL as VOTED and PASSED by 2005 Town Meeting and re-approved at Special Town Meeting Sept. 12

EDITORIAL-


A voice of compassion, an example of fairness and reasonable government.

One who believes in the strength and comfort you, your children and your family can draw from good government leadership.

A person who knows Atkinson is our home -- our most important possession that must be preserved and protected through fair taxes and sound community planning and where our children must be safe to grow to become a new generation of leaders.

One who knows that the citizens of Atkinson are all neighbors with her leadership to be dedicated and responsive to all.

One who believes that when those from Atkinson have served our nation and honors are deserved, those honors must be given.

In Valerie Tobin, we now have a leader we know we can entrust with these responsibilities because they are part of her character.

It is our honor to endorse Valerie for election to Atkinson’s Board of Selectmen.

Just a note for those who wish to count the deer.

In January 08 this blog had 16,000 hits and 1,500 unique visitors (for the month).

In 2007 this blog had over 100,000 hits and 5,750 unique visitors (for the year).

EDITORIAL-


"I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense . . ." [TP, 1776]

We take no small measure of umbrage at such a hostile official act against this BLOG’s patron. Therefore, a timely Editorial comment is both appropriate and necessary.

Discussion of Atkinson’s financial direction, from any viewpoint, is fundamental and encouraged and we will always attempt to limit and correct errors.

However, Righteous indignation towards purported error of such inconsequential nature is not appropriate.

The ENTIRE car deal is problematic. If it was caused by poor judgement, improper exercise of authority, neglect or mistake or even specious reasoning, this will never trump the facts that the entire questionable transaction started and ended within a very small circle of confidants.

We find the entire circumstances surrounding the disposition of the police Cruiser highly irregular at the least and the "explanations" somewhat trifling and exhaustive of our intellect.

Mr. Consentino: It’s time to go. Being Chief of Atkinson’s Police Department is NOT a birthright. That is a fabled legend of yesteryear.

Historically in Atkinson, police chief appointments were made "under the hand of the selectmen" for terms of one year at a time, as was also the case in the beginning of Mr. Consentino’s assorted and discontinuous stream of appointments to this position.

Your only remaining credential established on a claim of indispensability has faded.

So time is neigh. Plan a graceful exit, Clean out your desk, Accept the gratitude and tearful sentiments from some. We plan no editorial recriminations. It is time. Thank you for your service, We wish you a long and happy retirement. Bon Voyage.

LETTER


"To All Atkinson Residents,

I am writing to ask for your help. A member of the Atkinson Police Department needs our help. I am here to ask for your help in Corporal John Lapham's fight for his life. As you are aware, John has been diagnosed with Leukemia. He has been once again hospitalized with an infection that is threatening his life. He is one of the bravest people that I have ever met. He has never asked of anything from the residents of the town. Now is our chance to step up and help both him and his family out. As everyone is aware John has been out of work for a few months. His family has been busy helping John to get better. He needs our help, and I am hoping that this town can step up to the plate and help. From the moment that I met John, I have admired him. He does alot, but never asks for anything in return. He has helped so many people in this town. I for one am one of those people. Please help him.

There is a fund set-up in his name at TDBanknorth in Plaistow. Any amount will help John, while he is out of work. It would be great if this town could help ease a burden off his wife.

Thank You

Also if anyone would like to send a card, please address it to:

John Lapham
c/o Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Ctr.
Inpatient mail
75 Francis Street
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Please show Corporal John Lapham, that this community can stand up and show our support to those in need. I for one, miss John and can not wait until he can get better and return to work. Please show him that we support him. "