Welcome to another contributor under the Publius byline.
Publius: Article Submission please
Seenitdoneit said:
One of the most common mistakes layman make with the law is that they take a single line out of a statute, and twist it to cover their own excesses. Atkinson's selectmen Consentino, Childs, Sapia, along with the advise of unofficial consiglierre Polito, have gotten really good at this. And the reason they have gotten away with it is that noone has taken the time, energy, and expense of taking them to court to get a Judge to rule on it.
For the record the selectmen ARE NOT the "general agents" for the people. They have specific enumerated powers that they can accomplish without calling a special town meeting to ask the people's permission.
Every Statute(RSA) has annotations at the bottom. If you have access to legal references, they tell you the case law that defines the statute, and how it is to be interpreted. Here are the selectmen's duties;
1.) Perhaps their most important function is to call the meeting.
2.) To manage the "prudential" affairs of the town. This means filling in the details necesary to carry out the votes taken at town meeting. "the power to act, while broad, is not unlimited. The selectmen are not the general agents of the town and therefore have no broad authority to act with the full power of the town." Moulton v. Beals, 98 NH 461 (1954).
3.) RSA 41:8 "a majority of the selectmen shall be competent at all times." This does not mean mentally competent, although that would be nice too. It means that for the board to take an action, any action, such as buying an SUV, a majortiy of the board must vote, and RSA 91A further states that this vote must be taken in a public meeting. There is much case law on this ranging all the way back to 1854.
Here are the selectmen's statutory responsibilities;
1.) Laying out of roads and highways. RSA 231:8-19 cover this, RSA 41:11 includes in this setting speed limits, and weight restrictions. They also braodly supervise the road agent. This means the selectmen set out the broad goals and policies for the road agent to accomplish and follow. NOT that they call him into every meeting to assasinate his character over some new imagined evil.
2.) Condemning buildings deemed hazardous. RSA 155B allows this authority.
3.) Licensing. There are many RSA's covering a number of lisence types, such as junkyards, movie theatres, etc.
4.) Health Regulations. RSA 147, gives the selectmen and the health officer the power together of a board of health.
5.) Setting Fees. RSA 41:9 allows the selectmen to set fees such as permits, lisences and the such.
6.) Set Welfare guidelines. This is inherently a selectmen function, which in the case of elderly affairs they have farmed out without oversight to the chief.
7.) Manage use of town property. This is self-explanatory.
8.) Financial Accounting and safeguarding. The selectmen are authorized to spend the budgeted money. They must spend it wisely, and keep true and accurate records, and they are accountable at all times to the legislative body(the people)
9.) Appoint officers. This includes planning board members, ZBA members, inspectors.
10.) Election Duties. The selectmen are responsible for the phyical structure of the polling place. the set up, and layout. However RSA 659:9 designates the moderator as the town's chief election official.
11.) Setting ordinances. This one is conditional in towns of less than 10,000 population. If the legislative body has given the selectmen the authority they may enact ordinances. I don't believe Atkinson has ever done that.
12.) Taxation. The selectmen must report to the tax collector, the assessed value of all property in town, and all abatements they have granted.
13.) Litigation. The selectmen MUST work to resolve and/or defend the town against all ations brought against the town for its actions or those of it's employees, or boards. This is why selectman Sapia's offer and provision of sworn affidavits to help Mr. Polito's case AGAINST the town was so heinous.
That is the breadth of their statutory authority. They do not "run the town". They do not have authority over other elected officals, except in cetain circumstances.
AUTHORITY OVER OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS;
For the most part the elected officials have their own statutory authority, and regulations, and are INDEPENDENT OF THE SELECTMEN. Officials like the town clerk, tax collector, and treasurer, the budget committee, the conflict of interest committee, the library trustees; the selectmen have NO AUTHORITY OVER.
The selectmen can not interfere with the exercise of duties that are, by statute, delegated to those officials.
hopefully this will help the residents understand when the selectmen are overstepping thier bounds.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
EDITORIAL-
A voice of compassion, an example of fairness and reasonable government.
One who believes in the strength and comfort you, your children and your family can draw from good government leadership.
A person who knows Atkinson is our home -- our most important possession that must be preserved and protected through fair taxes and sound community planning and where our children must be safe to grow to become a new generation of leaders.
One who knows that the citizens of Atkinson are all neighbors with her leadership to be dedicated and responsive to all.
One who believes that when those from Atkinson have served our nation and honors are deserved, those honors must be given.
In Valerie Tobin, we now have a leader we know we can entrust with these responsibilities because they are part of her character.
It is our honor to endorse Valerie for election to Atkinson’s Board of Selectmen.
Just a note for those who wish to count the deer.
In January 08 this blog had 16,000 hits and 1,500 unique visitors (for the month).
In 2007 this blog had over 100,000 hits and 5,750 unique visitors (for the year).
In 2007 this blog had over 100,000 hits and 5,750 unique visitors (for the year).
EDITORIAL-
"I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense . . ." [TP, 1776]
We take no small measure of umbrage at such a hostile official act against this BLOG’s patron. Therefore, a timely Editorial comment is both appropriate and necessary.
Discussion of Atkinson’s financial direction, from any viewpoint, is fundamental and encouraged and we will always attempt to limit and correct errors.
However, Righteous indignation towards purported error of such inconsequential nature is not appropriate.
The ENTIRE car deal is problematic. If it was caused by poor judgement, improper exercise of authority, neglect or mistake or even specious reasoning, this will never trump the facts that the entire questionable transaction started and ended within a very small circle of confidants.
We find the entire circumstances surrounding the disposition of the police Cruiser highly irregular at the least and the "explanations" somewhat trifling and exhaustive of our intellect.
Mr. Consentino: It’s time to go. Being Chief of Atkinson’s Police Department is NOT a birthright. That is a fabled legend of yesteryear.
Historically in Atkinson, police chief appointments were made "under the hand of the selectmen" for terms of one year at a time, as was also the case in the beginning of Mr. Consentino’s assorted and discontinuous stream of appointments to this position.
Your only remaining credential established on a claim of indispensability has faded.
So time is neigh. Plan a graceful exit, Clean out your desk, Accept the gratitude and tearful sentiments from some. We plan no editorial recriminations. It is time. Thank you for your service, We wish you a long and happy retirement. Bon Voyage.
LETTER
"To All Atkinson Residents,
I am writing to ask for your help. A member of the Atkinson Police Department needs our help. I am here to ask for your help in Corporal John Lapham's fight for his life. As you are aware, John has been diagnosed with Leukemia. He has been once again hospitalized with an infection that is threatening his life. He is one of the bravest people that I have ever met. He has never asked of anything from the residents of the town. Now is our chance to step up and help both him and his family out. As everyone is aware John has been out of work for a few months. His family has been busy helping John to get better. He needs our help, and I am hoping that this town can step up to the plate and help. From the moment that I met John, I have admired him. He does alot, but never asks for anything in return. He has helped so many people in this town. I for one am one of those people. Please help him.
There is a fund set-up in his name at TDBanknorth in Plaistow. Any amount will help John, while he is out of work. It would be great if this town could help ease a burden off his wife.
Thank You
Also if anyone would like to send a card, please address it to:
John Lapham
c/o Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Ctr.
Inpatient mail
75 Francis Street
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Please show Corporal John Lapham, that this community can stand up and show our support to those in need. I for one, miss John and can not wait until he can get better and return to work. Please show him that we support him. "
7 comments:
There is a difference between "Elderly Affairs" and "Welfare Guidelines", in that you don't have to be a senior citizen to be eligible for welfare.
Moreover, (and Thank God), the Police Chief has nothing to do with Welfare. It is solely under the control of the Board of Selectmen. Welfare Guidelines are generally set forth by the State, and adapted by towns to fit their own needs/requirements. As does the Police Chief, the names of welfare recipients are closely guarded and are not released to the public. The difference between the two lists is that the Selectmen's list includes only those who have applied for and/or recieve welfare, and the list is never used as a mail-out list.
Just thought I'd clarify that...don't want the residents who need help fearing that they may have to face "the Chief". That doesn't happen.
Dear Seeitdoneit, I REALLY doubt you are an attorney because you simply make soooo many mistakes. Your analysis of the statutory authority of the Selectmen is so incomplete it is laughable. Let me give you one (there are many) example of just how incomplete you are. Please read the following RSA on Road Agent:
Section 231:65 231:65 Oath; Bond; Supervision. – Highway agents and expert highway agents shall be sworn to the faithful discharge of their duty, give bonds to the satisfaction of the selectmen for the faithful performance of the duties of the office, and be responsible to them for the expenditure of money and the discharge of their duties generally. The selectmen may supervise the methods and manner of performance of such agents. If any highway agent shall intentionally or deliberately refuse or neglect to comply with lawful instructions of the selectmen, or shall intentionally or deliberately refuse or neglect to carry out the duties prescribed by law for highway agents after written request by the selectmen, the selectmen may remove such agent from office. The selectmen shall file a copy of any such order of removal, under their hands, with the town clerk.
Seems to me that Mr. Stewart can’t thumb his nose at the selectmen! Seems to me that managing the road agent is one of many important responsibilities the Selectmen have, and you totally missed it!
I think you might want to call the New Hampshire Local Government Center (Atkinson is a member) and learn a thing or two. They will tell you that the Selectmen DO RUN THE TOWN!
For your edification, Mr. Moderator(an educated guess) BU School of Law, Class of '92.
As usual you were not paying attention. I never said Mr. Stewart could thumb his nose at the selectmen. I said "they can not effect duties that are the road agents by statute which is exactly what the statute you quoted also says.
And further I doubt that NHMA would say that the selectmen have total authority over all aspects of town governance as so many NH Supreme Court decisions have said otherwise. When I have more time I will cite some of these for you.
When are people going to accept the fact that the law does not seem to matter much around here. You can quote RSAs all day long. They are meaningless until town voters organize and demand legal compliance. The list is too long to type. Where is the outrage?
For future posts on RSAs, where possible, please provide internet addresses so that we can confirm information. I prefer to read the RSAs myself and make my own interpretation. Thanks.
And thanks for the information on the NH Local Govt Center. I did not know about it but looked it up on the web and found it at:
http://nhmuni.home.virtualtownhall.net/Home/
It looks like our selectman can use this service to get clarifications on legal questions:
"The Local Government Center has three attorneys available to answer inquiries and provide general legal assistance to elected and appointed officials from member towns, cities and village districts. The attorneys also prepare and provide articles, handbooks, workshops and other educational programs and publications. Occasionally, LGC attorneys submit amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs to the New Hampshire Supreme Court on behalf of member municipalities."
I wonder how often our selectman use this service??????????
Too many times I have heard half-truths and misleading statements that, unless you know the exact wording of an RSA, become fertile ground for those abusers who manipulate the truth - and they know EXACTLY what I am talking about. They truly despise this blog because it compromises their advantage which is knowledge. They take full advantage of their "official capacity" as a person "with the knowledge" when half the time they are making it up as they go.
An educated voter base is a manipulators biggest fear. If the "quoters" of RSAs are challenged every time they cite an RSA (ie: SHOW ME in hard copy or provide a web address), then only after confirmation it will be accepted as fact.
Just because you SOUND like you know what you are talking about doesn't make it so.
So the next time someone quotes an RSA:
1) Demand to see it in hard copy out of a NH RSA manual or other official reference book
Or
2) Demand a web address so that you can confirm it yourself.
If option 1 or 2 cannot be satisfied, then their statement does not exist as far as I am concerned.
Demand the facts and only accept the facts after confirming them yourself. I would ask all posters of "facts" to end their posting with a reference such as a book name, page, section, RSA, etc.; and/or a web address; and/or reference to some other official publication or meeting minutes.
You can always find state laws at:
www.nh.gov
then click n the laws and rules link on the left, click on the state statutes link, then choose either search or browse.
This is the link for all state statutes:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/nhtoc.htm
From there you simply click on the chapter number you are looking for anf follow the menus to the specific RSA.
Post a Comment